Best Ateez members

100 ELO points separate Seonghwa from San at the top of the Ateez ranking, after 3741 duels.

Seonghwa claims the top spot with 1342 ELO points over 414 duels, establishing a decisive lead over second-placed San at 1242 points. This 100-point gap between ranks 1 and 2 marks the widest divide in the ranking, setting Seonghwa apart from the rest of the group. Wooyoung holds third position with 1198 ELO points and posts a 58 percent win rate across 378 duels, demonstrating consistent appeal in head-to-head matchups. The middle section reveals tight competition: Yeosang at rank 4 with 1174 points sits just 2 ELO points ahead of Mingi at 1172, suggesting the fanbase remains divided on these members. Hongjoong follows at rank 6 with 1167 points and a 54 percent win rate over 389 duels. At the bottom, Jongho ranks eighth with 1152 points and a 37 percent win rate across 352 duels, while Yunho sits just above at rank 7 with 1154 points, indicating these positions reflect where voter preferences concentrate least within the eight-member group.

This ranking draws on 3741 duels conducted by 231 players across all 8 contenders, with the latest update recorded on 10 October 2026. The vote continues to accept new contributions, allowing fans to influence the standings and challenge the current hierarchy. Visit VAINKEURZ to participate in the duels and register your preference among the Ateez members.

Updated on October 10, 2026

How this ranking is computed

Every duel won lifts a contender and every loss drops them, by an amount that depends on the opponent's strength: beating the leader is worth more than beating the last. It is an ELO, the same principle as in chess. Duels are not drawn at random — an adaptive entropy sort puts the least predictable match-ups first, which settles the ranking far faster than a full round robin. A worldwide ranking is only published past 30 completed plays. Known limit: a contender who has faced few opponents keeps an approximate score, and the bottom of the table moves more than the podium.

How our rankings are made →